Finally! U.S. Supreme Court To Hear Concealed Carry Case

13
1247

If you’ve been paying attention to the U.S. Supreme Court over the last few years, then you’ve likely been really disappointed in how the court, which, now, supposedly has a “conservative” majority, has been opting out of making a ruling on (what seems like) any case that might give a constitutionalist outcome.

Can’t let Americans have liberty, can they?

But the Supreme Court may have the chance to (at least partly) redeem themselves and their passive surrender to leftists lower court rulings. How? By taking up a concealed carry case from the State of New York.

Advertisement

Yes, the Supreme Court will finally have the chance to break leftist gun restrictions in one of the major gun control states. Jack Phillips writes,

The Supreme Court has decided to take up a major, National Rifle Association (NRA)-backed lawsuit that challenges a New York law restricting individuals from carrying concealed handguns in public.

It’s been more than 10 years since the Supreme Court weighed in on a significant case involving the Second Amendment, coming in the wake of President Joe Biden’s and top Democrats’ recent push for more gun-control initiatives, including bans on so-called ghost guns, proposing models for “red flag” laws, and expanding and lengthening background checks.

“The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to the following question: Whether the State’s denial of petitioners’ applications for concealed-carry licenses for self-defense violated the Second Amendment,” reads a brief order […] from the high court on April 26.

Over the years, the NRA and other gun rights groups have criticized the Supreme Court for not taking up any major lawsuits relating to the Second Amendment. In 2008, the court stated for the first time that the Second Amendment protects Americans’ rights to keep and bear arms for self-defense at home.

While this case may not give the court the option to give a full on, nationwide ruling for constitutional carry (they should), it would at least give them the opportunity to prevent leftist states from making it more difficulty for Americans to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

Let’s hope that they do the right thing.

Advertisement

13 COMMENTS

  1. It’s very simple, just void every law infringing on 2nd amendment rights, all 20,000+ laws. Not a single one of them has done anything to curb violent criminals.

    • They already did, but everyone is ignoring it.

      “All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”
      Marbury v. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176 (1803)”

      This is still good case law.

  2. I support the 2and amendment. I also support concealed carry. I also support the troops and policeman who
    enforce our laws.

    • THANK YOU as do I, got out of service June 1st 1965 bought a 1911 June 2 1965 loaded in store stuck it down
      back of jeans stayed there till 2004 till I got back problems now its a smaller 9 mm also now have CC

  3. SUPPORT the BLUE LINE.
    Support our soldiers, sailors, Coasties, fliers, Marines. Border Patrol, and all those who put their lives in danger to protect us!
    Tell the DEMONS to go back to hell where they belong, these TRAITORS!

  4. The right to carry at home and in public is what’s needed we never needed a license to carry a firearm that’s not freedom its control the law ain’t no better than us and they dam sure dont protect us

  5. What part of “Shall not be infringed,” do these leftist idiots not understand? I guess plain English isn’t plain enough for them!

  6. I should have added this to my comment above, that they have had almost 245 years to figure it out. Every elementary grade school kid above the 3rd grade level could give them the correct answer to that question;at least I think they should!

  7. If the “Authorities have not used the existing rules to stop gun violence and/or stupidity (Hunter Biden’s abuse of tegulations) why give them more regulations that will go unenforced?

  8. NO phrase ticks me off like the term “gun violence”. In the English language, the term says that it is the gun causing the violence while the truth is just the opposite. A gun is just a tool of a violent person, it is NOT the cause.
    It really bothers me that pro-self-defense people are allowing the anti-gun crowd to set the terms of the discussion.
    PLEASE don’t encourage the opposition this way.

  9. The first thing thats going to have to happen, is that John Boy and some of the other justices are going to have to read, slowly, the constitution at least once and try to understand what it says.

  10. My Family has bleed in every war this🇺🇲 country has been in from the Revolution to Afghanistan…My🇺🇲 father was torchured by the Chinese in North Korea,only to escape hours⏳ before his planned exaction,as he was to be hung at dawn‼️ to lay🦠 in the rice patties with his🤕 torchured body of open soars, waiting on a extraction for he wasn’t their⁉️ ,yet he was‼️‼️ All For The 🇺🇲 USA Constatiution,& there for the God given Rights in it, as Our 2nd Amendment, the right to bare arms… Kimberly A Garretson

Comments are closed.