Have you ever had an incredibly stressful situation that, when one thing about it changed, you just felt such a sense of relief? Of course you have.
Maybe it was when that police car with the flashing lights behind you that you thought was going to pull you over instead passes you by and keeps going. Or maybe you were hearing rumors of layoffs at work that turned out to be overblown and you kept your job. Or maybe your newborn baby who has been crying nonstop for the last 20 minutes burped and, then, fell sound asleep on your shoulder.
Your relief in all of these situations was real and tangible.
And you may feel a similar sense of relief when you find out about who is running Joe Biden’s White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention. Larry Keane writes,
The White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention will be headed up by none other than Vice President Kamala Harris. Vice President Harris said in a statement, “The new Office of Gun Violence Prevention will play a critical role in implementing President Biden’s and my efforts to reduce violence to the fullest extent under the law, while also engaging and encouraging Congressional leaders, state and local leaders, and advocates to come together to build upon the meaningful progress that we have made to save lives.”
This new office can be added to the list of other tasks with which the vice president has been charged. That includes voting rights, the U.S. southern border, abortion, artificial intelligence, water policy, promoting child tax credits, COVID-19 vaccine education, heading the National Space Council, expanding nationwide broadband access, union labor expansion and stopping online harassment. None of those portfolios show progress.
That last sentence should give you a clue as to why Harris running this “office” is a good thing for us: She isn’t getting anything done. Nothing is happening on those other fronts, and it’s likely that she’s going to be completely and totally ineffective with gun control just like she is with everything else.
Which is exactly what those who support gun rights want. After all, if you have an office specifically for the purpose of pushing gun control, then, you want the office to be nothing more than political theater without any ability to get anything done.
With that in mind, there’s no one else that I’d rather run that office than Kamala Harris. No one at all.
Come take it.
I HAVE NOTHING GOOD TO SAY ABOUT BIDEN OR HARRIS, WHO BOTH SHOULD BE TRIED FOR TREASON AGAINST THE UNITED STATES. BUT WE KNOW THAT WILL NEVER HAPPEN, BECAUSE WE HAVE WEAK BACKED REPRESENTATIVES WHO GO ALONG TO GET ALONG. THEY HAVE FORGOTTEN THAT THEY WORK FOR THE CITIZENS OF THIS COUNTRY AND COME ELECTION TIME A LOT OF THE RINO’S WILL BE VOTED OUT. THE SQUAD IS COMMUNIST HATES THIS COUNTRY AND SHOULD BE DEPORTED BACK TO THEIR OWN COUNTRY. IF WE AS A NATION DON’T COME TOGETHER AND GET RID OF THESE LEFTIST COMMUNIST SOCIALIST ELECTION TIME THEN MARK MY WORDS YOU CAN KISS FREEDOM GOOD BYE. LETS VOTE AND TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK.
The gun isn’t the problem, the criminals coddled by the left and released time-and again to prey on the public have created the problem.
Stay very, very far away from anything to do with this website.
Caleb Lee is a scamming scumbag & his “reps” are ridiculously brutal, threatening jerks.
Reported to the state’s attorney, moving ahead with complaints to the US & his VA state’s attorney next.
You need to take a breath & hold it…til you pass out
Or pass on.
First of all you have made NO progress , why before the 50’s and even before did we not have this problem , yes during the prohibition era there was a rise in gun crimes but settled down afterword’s , so I can’t see it being a problem of the gun …
I think its more of a problem with PEOPLE and the government …
What so many don’t seem to understand is that the Second Amendment was written so the WE THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES could and still should be able to defend ourselves against a totalitarian government. A government like we now face. Of course, the First Amendment, that pretty much tells of the freedoms we’re entitled to, especially those of us who’ve helped defend our country. My generation sacrificed many of our teenage years to defend the U.S. against Japan that attacked us in 1941. There’s a very good chance we’ll be attacked again. There are very few of us left from that era, but speaking for myself, I most definitely will not hesitate to return fire. Actually, I’m pushing 100 years, so what do I have to lose? The Chinks will no doubt get me but you can bet the old homestead I’ll take a few with me. Too bad our younger generations don’t have the guts to do the same. We left many behind in the Pacific when we came home in 1945. That being the case, I find it hard to understand why people don’t now understand what it takes to preserve our freedom. It took guts back in my time and that in addition to patriotism simply to be no longer in vogue. Hopefully I’m wrong in my opinion of the young people in the U.S.
That office is a danger anyway, because of the type of power that is in it. It will likely become run by somebody very effective in using that power unless that office is abolished.
No one will think it is ok for themselves to be fired for someone elses actions so why would it be ok in their opinion for my gun rights to be taken away or for me to.be punished because of a lawless persons actions get real people !
Comments are closed.