Gun Buybacks Question Makes People Laugh At MSNBC Host


It’s a rare situation when someone in the mainstream media has the courage to ask (or makes the mistake of asking) a non criminal gun owner about the reality of guns and violence. Which makes sense. If you’re pushing an agenda, you don’t want opposing viewpoints actually being discussed. In fact, you don’t want people to even know about the other viewpoint.

But ask gun owners a question about gun control is exactly what an MSNBC host did recently, and he was probably surprised by the response: they laughed. Peer Hasson gives us the details:

A panel of gun owners laughed in the face of MSNBC host Ali Velshi when he asked what they thought of gun buyback proposals from Democratic politicians.

“Let me ask you about a proposal floated out there by a presidential candidate, or more, about gun buybacks. Who thinks that is a good idea?” Velshi asked. Several panelists immediately burst into laughter, while another mocked the question, joking: “I want mine for a million bucks, so if they’re willing to pay me that.”

Several members of the panel raised their hands when asked if Democratic gun control proposals would affect their vote in the 2020 election. Three panelists answered yes when asked if the gun issue would “most determine who you would vote for.” 

“Oh yeah, yeah,” answered one voter, a black American man. “Don’t mess with my rights to protect my family by trying to take away my firearms.”

You can watch the less than two minute video here:


That’s pretty clear. Gun owners are passionate about owning guns, but, as one of the panelists made clear, it’s not because gun owners are seeking violence or want to hurt people. No, gun owners want to be able to protect their families, and gun control laws hinder that ability.

These people get it. We need to continue to fight to keep our 2nd Amendment rights.



  1. Yea! How about that? Even ‘black ‘ American ‘ patriots tell the socialist idiots on tv”don’t take my gun “! You tell them guy!

  2. Amen! Thank the Good Lord this lady had the “balls” to protect herself and family from some low life scum bags. If the Dumbacrats have their way, this could’ve turned out a lot different. But an AR-15 should be banned. My Ass.

  3. Why not start disarming the Criminals in their neighborhood first and see how well your Communist ideas go, since one the first thing Communist do is lier and disarm you before taking your rights, wake up America doesn’t need PC Liberal Communist Democrats America can do better and when 2020 Election come Vote with Trump for one simple reason Liberty, Justice and most Freedom for all, Vote Trump.

  4. Let me just put this dialogue into a nutshell. You have the right to keep and bear arms OR not to if you so choose. BUT you do not have the right to say that I cannot??
    I cannot afford armed body guards like Bloomberg or geo soros (Not his Real Name) O also do not live in a gated community patrolled by armed security guards 24hrs a day .I must rely on myself or my family members, to protect themselves .The cops cannot do it.

    • Many people don’t know that police have neither the practical ability (for obvious reasons) OR any legal obligation to ‘protect’citizens…per judicial rulings all the way up to the Supreme Court.

  5. I need to get a recording of Woody Woodpecker’s laugh in case somebody acts me that kind of stupid question!

  6. All the liberals want to do is to control the subjects. We will no longer be citizens. They need to be able to control our thoughts so that opposing viewpoints cannot be discussed. All you have to do is listen to what they are proposing. Very little thought or brainpower has been used in developing their proposals. Most will not work because it is not thought out properly. They are totally incapable of competent thought. As someone once said, they are “educated beyond their capacity.” They have become “useful idiots.”

  7. Here is a prediction on how this would work: you may get some honest libs that inherited a firearm to sell, you will find some criminals selling damaged and/or inferior firearms in order to be able to get better/more powerful ones.
    In no cases will you have criminals intentionally disarming themselves. Criminals are ALREADY willing to break the law; that explains why the “gun-free zones” do not work, all they do is force law abiding citizens like most of us to involuntarily disarm ourselves, which leaves the criminal as the only one armed.

  8. You have a $3000 firearm that the State is going to purchase (how can this be considered a “buyback?”) from you. Since they are basically “confiscating the firearm; because, they are not giving “fair-market” value, they will charge you sales tax on the purchase to add insult to the injury!

Comments are closed.